“Mad Max: Fury Road” - I started to watch this film once before and lasted about 15 or 20 minutes. It seemed awful and mindless. But when I saw it nominated for a Golden Globe and listed as one of the best films of 2015 by some movie critics, I decided I had to give it a second chance and watch it through to the end. I had never seen any of the previous three “Mad Max” films, also directed by George Miller, but I had some idea what was happening in these films. A post-apocalyptic Australia in an intense desert setting. Characters with wild outfits and strange names battle for necessities and turf using weirdly inventive motor vehicles and motorcycles. At the center of the latest “Mad Max” is, of course, Max Rockatansky (Tom Hardy), a loner in the middle of a certifiably crazy scene who has been captured by the bald-headed troops of Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne), the ruthless and masked aging overlord of the Citadel. But when Imperator Furiosa (Charlize Theron) escapes from the Citadel with a group of women, including Immortan Joe’s “wives,” Max finds himself joining their escape and the battle with Immortan Joe’s pursuing super-wheeled troops. What follows is the ultimate chase scene because in this movie the chase scene is virtually the entire film and what we see is like watching Cirque Du Soleil versus the monster trucks, with a touch of rock band thrown in. As the almost non-stop action rolls on, we witness people climbing and crawling over a variety of in-motion vehicles, flying like circus or trapeze artists, or crashing onto vehicles or the ground. The stunts are truly spectacular aided by an effective musical score. But ultimately one question must be faced. Is this, as some have said, a metaphor for our current situation where those in control of necessities, such as oil and energy, often run the world? If so, I found it to be a rather weak metaphor. Although Immortan Joe apparently has control of the water supply at the Citadel, and metes it out to the masses in small quantities, that seems a minor aspect of the plot (if one can call it that). Instead, “Mad Max: Fury Road” is simply the most awesome stunt/action film of all-time. However, while it has two top stars as the leads, neither Tom Hardy nor Charlize Theron demonstrates any significant acting chops in this film. Hardy’s Max barely talks and when he does, it sounds more like mumbling. Theron’s Furiosa, with grease all over her face, spends most of her time driving, fighting, and staring. One additional thought: no explanation is ever given for the fact that while the necessities of life (such as water and apparently food) are in short supply, there seems to be a never-ending supply of (1) gasoline to run the motor vehicles (although there is nary a gas station in sight) and (2) bullets and bombs. So, in conclusion, is this a film deserving of consideration for acclaim? On plot, I’d have to say no. But on its more than spectacular presentation, I’d have to say yes. A- (12/24/15) | |